|
The Plan Commission of the Village of Palos
Park, Cook County, IL, held a meeting on Thursday, August 21, 2008.
Chairman Pro Temp John Basso called the meeting to order at 7:47 p.m.
answering to roll call were: Paul Petan, Julie Kay, and Michael
Sundermeier. Steve Manning, Economic Development Director and John
Houseal, Village Planner, was also present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Michael Sundermeier
moved, seconded by Julie Kay, to approve the minutes of the June 26,
2008 regular meeting as presented. Upon voice vote, the motion carried
unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
- Consider
amendments for updating the Comprehensive Plan.
The members of the Plan
Commission continued their review and revision of the Comprehensive
Plan. John Houseal will be preparing an updated draft of the
Comprehensive Plan and was in attendance to help facilitate the
discussion which consisted of the following topics:
1.
Results of the Palos Park
Comprehensive Plan Update Resident Questionnaire in which approximately
50 residents participated. The highlights of the questionnaire are as
follows:
- The primary
advantages of living in Palos Park are lot size, environmental
features and small town character.
- Residents would
like development to include single family homes, restaurants and
retail stores.
- The three most
important issues facing the Village are protection of environmental
areas and resources, control of development and strength of tax
base, (need for economic development).
- Residents do not
want development that includes: apartments, industry, condominiums,
and senior housing.
- Palos Park’s
number one strength is its woodsy environment.
- Palos Park’s
weaknesses are, lack of retail sales tax, high taxes, ability to
keep trees, lack of a charming downtown area, traffic and
infrastructure.
- Residents
responded that the most important things the Village should be
working on over the next 10 years are retaining its uniqueness,
roads and infrastructure improvements. Not building sidewalks,
street lights or fences. Retention of large open yards. Build a
downtown around the train station. Make it big, “green” offer lots
of shopping, and restaurants that one can walk to.
2. Discussion about
the western growth area, is the planning jurisdiction that extends 1.5
miles beyond the western most point of the Village which is currently
Holy Family Villa. Steve Manning and John Houseal surveyed this area
for development potential.
John Houseal presented
a parcel map of this area. The area encompasses Bell Road and McCarthy
Road and Equestrian Estates to Archer Road and 111th Street.
According to state law in Illinois a municipality has a right to
plan 1 ˝ miles beyond its municipal boundaries. A municipality cannot
plan into another municipality but can plan into unincorporated areas.
In the past there has been interest in the northwest and southwest
corners of McCarthy and Bell Road. These parcels range in size from 7.5
to 8.5 acres. Both properties are currently vacant and for sale. John
Houseal said that there has been development interest for a bank,
restaurant, and a two-story retail office commercial development. This
area is surrounded by residential properties and homes are currently on
well and septic systems. These sites are in our planning jurisdiction.
These sites would require extending utilities out to this area. North
of that area is Archer Road and Bell Road and Kingery Highway. This
area is mostly established residential with well and septic. Lemont has
annexed several of the buildings in this area. There are only a few
commercial uses existing including three golf courses, automobile
repair, and a farm feed store. The purpose of annexing land is to
control development, and for a potential source of revenue, goods and
services for the Village.
John Basso asked how we
would approach the owners about the two parcels for sale on McCarthy and
Bell Road. John Houseal said the issue was bringing utilities out to
these parcels, which is very expensive. It is more feasible to bring
utilities out to these parcels now that we have annexed Holy Family
Villa since the Village boundary is now closer to this area. The
Village has to consider what the boundary area will be considered for
annexation. Is it Bell Road? What are the Plan Commission policies
regarding annexation strategy? The Comprehensive Plan should set a
policy for annexation.
3. Should the Sansone
Slough area next to Palos West School and the inquiry about developing
that area be put into the updated Comprehensive Plan?
John Houseal said that
another area for the Plan Commission to consider for possible annexation
is the Sansone Slough area at 131st and Wolf by Palos West
School Athletic Fields. The Village has been in discussions with the
school regarding improvement of the school facilities for recreational
opportunities. The Village has been interested in an educational trail
system with perhaps a boardwalk on the pond. The property owner has
discussed development of the property around Sansone Slough. Steve
Manning stated that there is a lot of interesting things coming together
on this 50 acre site. It is environmentally sensitive, has wetlands, a
water body, and standing trees next to a community facility. The ComEd
right-of-way bisects the area which could possibly become a bike path in
the future. The area fronts on 131st Street so it has some
non-resident development potential. Steve Manning said that the
Comprehensive Plan should reflect what is desirable to the Village for
the area. He recommended a bikeway in the ComEd right of way.
4. Highlights of the
University of Illinois, Chicago graduate student presentations and
planning ideas for development of the Village of Palos Park for a
“green” environmentally friendly perspective on the commercial downtown
development.
John Houseal did a
power point presentation which discussed the UIC graduate student
conceptual presentations. Ideas included:
- A 3,000 square
foot retail shops on the 80th Avenue area.
- Diverting 80th
Avenue to Southwest Highway and ending it by the bank to make the
area larger so a large retail development on the west side of
Southwest Highway can be built.
- Redirecting 80th
Avenue south of the Bank with the area of the railroad tracks over
to Southwest Highway so a commercial development could be built.
This would include a 17,000 square foot retail building and
additional 24,000 retail space. This idea would incorporate a large
area of residential and commercial property to create a larger
commercial shopping center on the east side of Southwest Highway.
- The Cal Sag
property leased through MWRD has to be for public use. The students
showed how a proposed museum/retail campus corridor along Cal Sag
north of that road.
- Rerouting 80th
Avenue so that it ends at the railroad tracks. Area on the east
side of Southwest Highway would be all commercial as well as the
west side of Southwest Highway extending to 119th
Street. All buildings totaling 175,000 square feet of retail
would have green roofs with parking area behind the building.
John Houseal said
that a draft of the Comprehensive Plan draft would be provided by the
next meeting which includes, the introduction, the vision, goals and
objectives, the land, transportation, bike plan and preliminary
implementation.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Items for the September
18, 2008 Plan Commission meeting must be submitted by August 25, 2008.
REQUEST FOR
COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE: None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further
discussion, Paul Petan moved, seconded by Michael Sundermeier, to
adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m. Upon voice vote, the motion carried
unanimously.
Minutes respectfully
submitted,
__________________________
Sally A. Kinney
Secretary to the Plan Commission
|